Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).

General Jurisdiction (PUBLISHED)

Year
Month
Judge

Date FiledJudgeCase NameKeywords: Click here to download opinion
11/12/2009SweeneyDARRELL BOYE et al., v. THE UNITED STATES, (07-195C)RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Third-Party Beneficiaries; Self-Determination Contracts; Law Enforcement and Criminal Investigation Services; Statute of Limitations; Continuing Claim Doctrine;Indian Law Enforcement Reform Act;Indian Self-Determination and..
11/10/2009BlockPlanetSpace Inc., v. United States of America, Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, Intervenor, and Orbital Sciences Corporation, Intervenor (09-476C)Bid Protest; Supplementing the Administrative Record; Extra-Record Evidence; Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
11/10/2009BushJENNIFER MORSE, v. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, (05-418V)National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006); Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Review of Special Master’s Determination of Reasonable Costs; Expert Costs; Remand for Consideration of Request for Additional Fees and Cos
11/09/2009SweeneyJOHNNY WOODSON vs. THE UNITED STATES (09-263C)Pro se complaint; prisoner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis; 28 U.S.C. § 1915; screening of prisoner complaint; 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; subject matter jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); tort claims; claims against individual federal officials
11/09/2009DamichPHILLIP OZDEMIR vs THE UNITED STATES (09-432 C)Bid Protest; Research and Plaintiff, Development Solicitation; Jurisdiction Over Non-Procurement Protest; Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Motion to Dismiss
11/06/2009AllegraPETRO-HUNT, L.L.C., vs. THE UNITED STATES (00-512L)Takings and contract case; Motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b); Servitudes – prescription under Louisiana law; Mineral leases; Statute of limitations – 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Permanent takings claim – accrual suspension rule; Permanent takings claim unti
11/05/2009SmithTHE ANALYSIS GROUP, LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, and SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, (09-542C)Competition in Contracting Act, 31 U.S.C.§ 3553(d)(3)(A); Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(A)(2); Reilly’s Wholesale Produce v. United States, 73 Fed. l. 705 (2006); Planetspace Inc. v. United States, 86 Fed. Cl. 566 (2009); Preliminary...
11/04/2009Miller, G.AFGHAN AMERICAN ARMY SERVICES CORPORATION vs. THE UNITED STATES (09-388C)Post-Award Bid Protest; Cross-Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Prejudice to Protestor Due to Errors in the Procurement Process; Propriety of Injunctive Relief; Price Realism Analysis; Independent Government Estimate; Best-Value Analysis;
11/03/2009SmithEXXON MOBIL CORP., v. THE UNITED STATES, (09-165C)RCFC 40.2(a)(2)(B); RCFC 40.1(a)Entergy v. United States, 62 Fed. Cl. 798 (2004); Franconia Assocs. v. United States, 61 Fed. Cl. 798 (2004); Shell Oil v. United States,80 Fed. Cl. 411 (2008)
11/03/2009SmithTHE ESTATE OF E. WAYNE HAGE AND THE ESTATE OF JEAN N. HAGE, v. THE UNITED STATES, (91-1470L)43 U.S.C. § 1752(g); Regulatory Taking; Fifth Amendment; Motion for Partial Reconsideration; RCFC 59
10/30/2009Miller, C.GREGORY V. WOOD, v. THE UNITED STATES, (09-95C)Suit for monetary damages for unjust conviction and wrongful imprisonment, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1495, 2513 (2006); motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1),(6); whether § 2513 states jurisdictional requirements; use of nonprecedential opinions of United...
10/30/2009SmithPHILIP EMIABATA d/b/a NOVA EXPRESS, v. THE UNITED STATES, (06-702C)Motion for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56(b); Pro se Plaintiff; Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals; Collateral Estoppel; Issue Preclusion; Res Judicata; Claim Preclusion
10/30/2009BradenBrad J. Montagne and Teri L. Montagne v. The United States (09-201)Forfeiture, 28 U.S.C. § 2514; Jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6); Pro Se; Transfer, 28 U.S.C. §1631; Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); 26 U.S.C. §§ 183(a), 183(c); 26 U.S.C. §1401(a); 26 U.S.C. § 6201(a)(1); 26 U.S.C. §§ 6212(a)-(b); 26 U.S.
10/30/2009BradenRALPH HUSBAND v. THE UNITED STATES (09-74C)Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1); Implied-In-Fact Bailment Contract; Intentional tort Exception, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h); Jurisdiction; Pro Se; Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, U.S. Const. Amend. V; Tra
10/28/2009BrugginkTAKOTA CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES, (06-553C)Government Contracts; Construction Law; Differing Site Conditions; Breach of Contract; Summary Judgment
10/27/2009BaskirMANOR CARE, INC., (f/k/a HCR MANOR CARE, INC.) and Affiliated Subsidiaries, et al. v.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (07-776T)Tax refund case; Employer Tax Credits; Work Opportunity Tax Credit and Welfare-to-Work, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 51 and 51A; Statutory construction; Qualified individuals “certified by the designated local agency;” Special rules for certifications, 26 U.S.C.A
10/26/2009Miller, C.LA TRETHA E. STROUGHTER, pro se, and JEROME W. SMITH, pro se, v. THE UNITED STATES, (09-404C, 09-413C)Patents; patent infringement; motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,RCFC 12(b)1); pro se plaintiffs; requirement of issued patent for infringement action, 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (2006); consolidation, RCFC 42(a)(2); diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. . .
10/26/2009WilliamsFIRST ANNAPOLIS BANCORP, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, (94-522C)Breach of Contract; Winstar Damages; Shifting of Regulatory Risk; Forbearance Allowing Excess Investment in Service Corporations; Material Breach; Date of Breach; Judicial Estoppel; Restitution; Partial Performance; Unfair Windfall; Tax Gross-Up
10/26/2009LettowFRANCES CAMPBELL vs. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (07-465V)Vaccine case; off-Table claim stemming from rheumatoid arthritis allegedly caused by trivalent influenza vaccine; required elements of proof; causation
10/23/2009HewittIMPRESA CONSTRUZIONI GEOM. DOMENICO GARUFI v. THE UNITED STATES (99-400C c/w 01-708C)Equal Access to Justice Act; 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2006); Supplementation of Application Required to Document Number of Employees and Net Worth of Sole Proprietorship